(1)Congressman Ken met Warren Lock, head of Proxy Cyber Pharmaceutical at a small Italian restaurant just outside of Georgetown.
Congressman Ken buttered a roll and snapped his fingers for the waiter wondering if the server was intentionally taking too long taking the order of "the type" who goes out of their way to be overly friendly to waiters and other low wage types .A trick liberal "types" often use the Congressman thought to induce false camaraderie in others so they might force others to ascertain they were on the same ticket.On the same boat. This kind used smiles and politeness to en-train another's affinity subliminally. This sneaky type looked for affiliation anywhere they could find it. The waiter seemed to be taking it all in .How quickly the liberal agenda could snatch low wage earners into their dominion thought Congressman Ken looking at Warren Lock who was also looking toward the table shaking his head .The two had discussed the topic of politeness and kindness being used by weaker people to promote solidarity as to ensnare others.
Warren began snapping his fingers at the waiter and next whistling as one might to a dog to disrupt what he told Ken looked like some damn" constituency" .
After the waiter finally took the time to take the two men's order Ken Wallinski got down to brass tacks with Warren discussing a redefining of the word -terrorism.Congressman Ken told Warren Lock that "The new definition of terrorist would widen the scope and scale of The War on Terrorism so the country could catch terror at it's true source which
was it's Ideology
Ken told Warren "No ONE bomber or shooter incites violence on a crowd with someone placing the notion to do so as just cause .Without fail some type of doctrine has being instilled upon them to do so.
Ken told Warren ,"He felt bad many times for the poor suicide bomber who had been brain washed to believe what they were doing was for a cause more than he felt bad for the cause -makers who held undo influence on the minds of the young. Just because someone pulls the trigger does not make them the true finger on the trigger .The strings upon these puppets are maneuvered by the rhetoric of clerics. Who is a Cleric? Often a religious leader but more often than not ,at least within our own borders the Instigator of upheaval has no religion but his own. And what are these ungodly men and woman sowing in others on our soil? A contempt for any administrative body that attempts to dare pass rules upon the soil of Homeland that wishes to attenuate the masses to behaviors that make for peaceful ,paceful living .The Cleric in the USA of course does not stand behind a pulpit or dare mask his deviance under anything that even presumes a divinity greater than HE or SHE...No the Dissident .The Agitator will call themselves a writer or artist or poet.Songwriter.Playwrite.Journalist.Anything but Terrorist .
(2)
. . Military Use of Mind Control Weapons
Congressman Ken buttered a roll and snapped his fingers for the waiter wondering if the server was intentionally taking too long taking the order of "the type" who goes out of their way to be overly friendly to waiters and other low wage types .A trick liberal "types" often use the Congressman thought to induce false camaraderie in others so they might force others to ascertain they were on the same ticket.On the same boat. This kind used smiles and politeness to en-train another's affinity subliminally. This sneaky type looked for affiliation anywhere they could find it. The waiter seemed to be taking it all in .How quickly the liberal agenda could snatch low wage earners into their dominion thought Congressman Ken looking at Warren Lock who was also looking toward the table shaking his head .The two had discussed the topic of politeness and kindness being used by weaker people to promote solidarity as to ensnare others.
Warren began snapping his fingers at the waiter and next whistling as one might to a dog to disrupt what he told Ken looked like some damn" constituency" .
After the waiter finally took the time to take the two men's order Ken Wallinski got down to brass tacks with Warren discussing a redefining of the word -terrorism.Congressman Ken told Warren Lock that "The new definition of terrorist would widen the scope and scale of The War on Terrorism so the country could catch terror at it's true source which
was it's Ideology
Ken told Warren "No ONE bomber or shooter incites violence on a crowd with someone placing the notion to do so as just cause .Without fail some type of doctrine has being instilled upon them to do so.
Ken told Warren ,"He felt bad many times for the poor suicide bomber who had been brain washed to believe what they were doing was for a cause more than he felt bad for the cause -makers who held undo influence on the minds of the young. Just because someone pulls the trigger does not make them the true finger on the trigger .The strings upon these puppets are maneuvered by the rhetoric of clerics. Who is a Cleric? Often a religious leader but more often than not ,at least within our own borders the Instigator of upheaval has no religion but his own. And what are these ungodly men and woman sowing in others on our soil? A contempt for any administrative body that attempts to dare pass rules upon the soil of Homeland that wishes to attenuate the masses to behaviors that make for peaceful ,paceful living .The Cleric in the USA of course does not stand behind a pulpit or dare mask his deviance under anything that even presumes a divinity greater than HE or SHE...No the Dissident .The Agitator will call themselves a writer or artist or poet.Songwriter.Playwrite.Journalist.Anything but Terrorist .(2)
. . Military Use of Mind Control Weapons
Judy Wall
THE PERSIAN GULF WAR
For years, rumours have persisted that the United States Department
of Defense has been engaged in research and development of
ultra-sophisticated mind- altering technology. Confirmation of this
came to me recently in the form of two ITV News Bureau Ltd (London)
wire service bulletins.[1]
The March 23, 1991 newsbrief, "High-Tech Psychological Warfare
Arrives in the Middle East", describes a US Psychological
Operations (PsyOps) tactic directed against Iraqi troops in Kuwait
during Operation Desert Storm. The manoeuvre consisted of a system
in which subliminal mind-altering technology was carried on
standard radiofrequency broadcasts. The March 26, 1991 newsbrief
states that among the standard military planning groups in the
centre of US war planning operations at Riyadh was "an unbelievable
and highly classified PsyOps program utilising 'silent sound'
techniques".
The opportunity to use this method occurred when Saddam Hussein's
military command-and-control system was destroyed. The Iraqi troops
were then forced to use commercial FM radio stations to carry
encoded commands, which were broadcast on the 100 MHz frequency.
The US PsyOps team set up its own portable FM transmitter,
utilising the same frequency, in the deserted city of Al Khafji.
This US transmitter overpowered the local Iraqi station. Along with
patriotic and religious music, PsyOps transmitted "vague, confusing
and contradictory military orders and information".
Subliminally, a much more powerful technology was at work: a
sophisticated electronic system to 'speak' directly to the mind of
the listener, to alter and entrain his brainwaves, to manipulate
his brain's electroencephalograph ic (EEG) patterns and
artificially implant negative emotional states-feelings of fear,
anxiety, despair and hopelessness. This subliminal system doesn't
just tell a person to feel an emotion, it makes them feel it; it
implants that emotion in their minds.[2]
I noticed that the ITV wire service was from outside the United
States. Readers of Resonance may recall that in the
Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline in issue no. 29, reference is made
to the documentary video, Waco: The Big Lie Continues, which
contained video footage of three EM weapons. This segment of the
film was from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). I
wondered if there was any significance to this.
At the library I pulled up back issues of my local newspaper for
the same time-period of the Gulf War to see what the American wire
services had said, if anything, about the use of this special
PsyOps weapon. There was nothing said about it directly, but three
news articles seemed related. In a news release from Associated
Press during the same timeframe of the Gulf War truce, I read:
"The American pilot who shot down the second Iraqi warplane in 48
hours said Friday that continued Iraqi flights suggested that US
warnings were not filtering down to Iraqi pilots~ez_hellip~ He said he hopes
Saddam gets the message now. 'It's really too bad that these
people have to die for their unwillingness to heed our warnings...
What I really think is, they don't communicate down to the people,'
he said. 'If they have a communications problem, I suggest they fix
it.'"[3]
That may have been coincidence but two earlier news articles, dated
March 1, 1991, apparently have a common origin with the ITV news
bulletin. The first article[4] tells us that approximately 100
members of the US 101st Airborne Division, fluent in Arabic, talked
the enemy into surrendering. These soldiers rode in the Apache
helicopter gunships that were involved in the longest
helicopter-borne assault in history. They told the Iraqi troops
that they would be slaughtered if they didn't give up.
"They got the point," one soldier is quoted as saying.
This all sounds very unremarkable, except when you read the
editor's note: "The following dispatch was subject to US military
censorship." Now why would they want to censor such a mundane
tactic, except out of embarrassment that the US Army fighting
forces had fallen to the level of a cheer-leading squad?
... in which case they would have nixed the thing entirely.
But upon re-reading the article, we may pick out certain key
phrases (emphasised in italics):
"He [the soldier interviewed] was one of dozens of Arabic speakers
that played a key role in the allied ground attack against Iraq,
and part of an attempt by the US Army to use finesse, intelligence
work and tactics to complement brute strength."
If we fill in the missing blanks with such descriptions as "the
megaphone was used to direct psychoacoustic frequencies that
engaged the neural networks of the enemy's brain, causing him to
think any thought and feel any emotion that the Americans chose to
lay on him", then it starts to make sense. And it would no longer
seem so surprising that one soldier could talk 450 enemy soldiers
into surrendering. The possibilities are there, and, as the next
article[5] documents, that is exactly what happened. Iraqi troops
gave up en masse.
We quote: "They were surrendering in droves, almost too fast for us
to keep up with..."; "...two Iraqi majors, both brigade commanders,
who gave up their entire units..."; and "...one of them gave up to
an RPV [remotely piloted vehicle). Here's this guy with his hands
up, turning in a circle to give himself up to a model airplane with
a camera in it."
Irrational? Not if there was also a voice being beamed into his
head from that little flying toy, saying, "Give up, give up!"
Otherwise, how do we account for the editor's note at the beginning
of the article: "The following is based on pool dispatches that
were subject to military censorship." Without that note, we could
smugly think that the Iraqi soldiers were cowards or crazy, but why
censor that idea?
