definition

(1)Congressman Ken met  Warren Lock, head of Proxy Cyber Pharmaceutical  at a small Italian restaurant just outside of Georgetown.
Congressman Ken  buttered  a roll and snapped  his fingers for the waiter wondering if the server was intentionally taking too long taking the order of "the type" who goes out of their way to be overly friendly to waiters and other low wage types .A trick liberal "types" often use the Congressman thought to induce  false camaraderie in others so they might force others to ascertain they were on the same ticket.On the same boat. This kind used smiles and politeness to en-train another's affinity subliminally. This sneaky type looked for affiliation anywhere they could find it. The waiter seemed to be taking it  all in .How quickly the liberal agenda could snatch low wage earners into their dominion  thought Congressman Ken  looking at Warren Lock who was also looking toward the table shaking his head .The two had discussed the topic of politeness and kindness being used by weaker people to promote solidarity as to ensnare others.
Warren  began snapping his fingers at the waiter and next whistling as one might to a dog  to disrupt what he told Ken looked like some damn" constituency" .

After the waiter finally took the time to take the two men's order Ken Wallinski got down to brass tacks with Warren discussing a redefining of the word -terrorism.Congressman Ken told Warren Lock that "The new definition of terrorist would widen the scope and scale of The War on Terrorism so the country could   catch terror at it's true source which
was it's Ideology
Ken told Warren "No ONE bomber or shooter  incites violence on a crowd with someone  placing the notion to do so as just cause  .Without fail  some type of doctrine has  being instilled upon them to do so.
Ken told Warren ,"He felt bad many times for the poor suicide bomber who had been brain washed to believe what they were doing was for a cause more than he felt bad for the cause -makers who held undo influence on the minds of the young. Just because someone pulls the trigger does not make them the true finger on the trigger .The strings upon these puppets are maneuvered by the rhetoric of clerics. Who is a Cleric? Often a religious leader but more often than not ,at least within our own borders the Instigator of upheaval has no religion but his own. And what are these ungodly men and woman sowing in others on our soil? A contempt for any administrative body that attempts to dare pass rules upon the soil of Homeland that wishes to attenuate the masses to behaviors that make for peaceful ,paceful living .The Cleric in the USA of course does not stand behind a pulpit or dare mask his deviance under anything that even presumes a divinity greater than HE or SHE...No the Dissident .The Agitator will call themselves a writer or artist or poet.Songwriter.Playwrite.Journalist.Anything but Terrorist .

(2)
. . Military Use of Mind Control Weapons

Judy Wall 


THE PERSIAN GULF WAR



For years, rumours have persisted that the United States Department

of Defense has been engaged in research and development of

ultra-sophisticated mind- altering technology. Confirmation of this

came to me recently in the form of two ITV News Bureau Ltd (London)

wire service bulletins.[1]



The March 23, 1991 newsbrief, "High-Tech Psychological Warfare

Arrives in the Middle East", describes a US Psychological

Operations (PsyOps) tactic directed against Iraqi troops in Kuwait

during Operation Desert Storm. The manoeuvre consisted of a system

in which subliminal mind-altering technology was carried on

standard radiofrequency broadcasts. The March 26, 1991 newsbrief

states that among the standard military planning groups in the

centre of US war planning operations at Riyadh was "an unbelievable

and highly classified PsyOps program utilising 'silent sound'

techniques".



The opportunity to use this method occurred when Saddam Hussein's

military command-and-control system was destroyed. The Iraqi troops

were then forced to use commercial FM radio stations to carry

encoded commands, which were broadcast on the 100 MHz frequency.

The US PsyOps team set up its own portable FM transmitter,

utilising the same frequency, in the deserted city of Al Khafji.

This US transmitter overpowered the local Iraqi station. Along with

patriotic and religious music, PsyOps transmitted "vague, confusing

and contradictory military orders and information".



Subliminally, a much more powerful technology was at work: a

sophisticated electronic system to 'speak' directly to the mind of

the listener, to alter and entrain his brainwaves, to manipulate

his brain's electroencephalograph ic (EEG) patterns and

artificially implant negative emotional states-feelings of fear,

anxiety, despair and hopelessness. This subliminal system doesn't

just tell a person to feel an emotion, it makes them feel it; it

implants that emotion in their minds.[2]



I noticed that the ITV wire service was from outside the United

States.  Readers of Resonance may recall that in the

Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline in issue no. 29, reference is made

to the documentary video, Waco: The Big Lie Continues, which

contained video footage of three EM weapons. This segment of the

film was from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). I

wondered if there was any significance to this.



At the library I pulled up back issues of my local newspaper for

the same time-period of the Gulf War to see what the American wire

services had said, if anything, about the use of this special

PsyOps weapon. There was nothing said about it directly, but three

news articles seemed related. In a news release from Associated

Press during the same timeframe of the Gulf War truce, I read:



"The American pilot who shot down the second Iraqi warplane in 48

hours said Friday that continued Iraqi flights suggested that US

warnings were not filtering down to Iraqi pilots~ez_hellip~ He said he hopes

Saddam gets the message now.  'It's really too bad that these

people have to die for their unwillingness to heed our warnings...

What I really think is, they don't communicate down to the people,'

he said. 'If they have a communications problem, I suggest they fix

it.'"[3]



That may have been coincidence but two earlier news articles, dated

March 1, 1991, apparently have a common origin with the ITV news

bulletin. The first article[4] tells us that approximately 100

members of the US 101st Airborne Division, fluent in Arabic, talked

the enemy into surrendering. These soldiers rode in the Apache

helicopter gunships that were involved in the longest

helicopter-borne assault in history. They told the Iraqi troops

that they would be slaughtered if they didn't give up.



"They got the point," one soldier is quoted as saying.



This all sounds very unremarkable, except when you read the

editor's note: "The following dispatch was subject to US military

censorship." Now why would they want to censor such a mundane

tactic, except out of embarrassment that the US Army fighting

forces had fallen to the level of a cheer-leading squad?

... in which case they would have nixed the thing entirely.



But upon re-reading the article, we may pick out certain key

phrases (emphasised in italics):



"He [the soldier interviewed] was one of dozens of Arabic speakers

that played a key role in the allied ground attack against Iraq,

and part of an attempt by the US Army to use finesse, intelligence

work and tactics to complement brute strength."



If we fill in the missing blanks with such descriptions as "the

megaphone was used to direct psychoacoustic frequencies that

engaged the neural networks of the enemy's brain, causing him to

think any thought and feel any emotion that the Americans chose to

lay on him", then it starts to make sense. And it would no longer

seem so surprising that one soldier could talk 450 enemy soldiers

into surrendering. The possibilities are there, and, as the next

article[5] documents, that is exactly what happened. Iraqi troops

gave up en masse.



We quote: "They were surrendering in droves, almost too fast for us

to keep up with..."; "...two Iraqi majors, both brigade commanders,

who gave up their entire units..."; and "...one of them gave up to

an RPV [remotely piloted vehicle). Here's this guy with his hands

up, turning in a circle to give himself up to a model airplane with

a camera in it."



Irrational? Not if there was also a voice being beamed into his

head from that little flying toy, saying, "Give up, give up!"

Otherwise, how do we account for the editor's note at the beginning

of the article: "The following is based on pool dispatches that

were subject to military censorship." Without that note, we could

smugly think that the Iraqi soldiers were cowards or crazy, but why

censor that idea?